← Back to Proposals
SHARDKEEP Tokenomics v3.1 — 1B Supply Model v3.1 Revision
Revised tokenomics with corrected node naming, Zone A accessibility, and structured airdrop schedule — March 29, 2026
Revises: Tokenomics v3 — Three Plans for SHARDKEEP Token Economics
Companion: Security Tiers, Revenue Model & Launch Strategy v3 • Global Equivalent Costs Evaluation
What Changed from v3
| Change | v3 | v3.1 | Rationale |
|---|
| Total supply |
100M genesis + 400M emissions (500M cap) |
1,000,000,000 (1B) with emissions |
Lower price per token = Zone A accessibility. More flexibility for perpetuity. |
| Node naming |
Vault XNode, Operator XNode |
Operator Node (highest), Vault Node (mid), XNode (lowest) |
Corrected hierarchy: Operator = backbone, Vault = shard storage, XNode = end-user PC/Mac |
| Model |
Three separate plans (A, B, C) |
Single hybrid: Plan B Spring + Plan C USD-pricing |
v3 recommended this hybrid. v3.1 implements it as the definitive model. |
| Airdrop allocation |
25M (25% of 100M genesis) |
50M (5% of 1B total), structured quarterly |
Marketing committed 5%. Quarterly waves through points system. |
| Token system |
Plan C proposed dual-token (SHARDKEEP + Vault Credits) |
Single SHARDKEEP token with USD-denominated pricing |
Simpler at launch. Oracle-based USD conversion at mainnet. |
| Burns |
No burns (all plans) |
No burns — all collected tokens recirculate through Project Bank |
Unchanged constraint. Confirmed. |
| Zone A design |
Mentioned Zone A affordability |
Full backward math: airdrop covers XNode bond + Guardian + 150% surplus |
Nigeria, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh users must be self-sufficient from airdrop alone. |
1. Node Tier Definitions
The SHARDKEEP network has three distinct node tiers. These names are definitive and must be used consistently throughout all documentation, code, and community communications.
Highest Tier
Operator Node
Backbone infrastructure
- Role: Aggregator/Authentication server
- Function: Routes shard requests, validates heartbeats, orchestrates shard rotations, manages consensus
- Hardware: Dedicated server or high-end VPS
- Uptime requirement: 99.5%+
- Bond: Highest (runs the network backbone)
- Earning: Highest rewards for infrastructure services
- Who runs these: Technical operators, data centers, infrastructure providers
Medium Tier
Vault Node
Shard Storage dedicated hardware
- Role: Stores encrypted shard fragments
- Function: Responds to shard requests, heartbeat proofs, participates in rotation
- Hardware: Raspberry Pi, VPS, or dedicated small server
- Uptime requirement: 95%+
- Bond: Medium (dedicated hardware for shard storage)
- Earning: Medium rewards for storage and availability
- Who runs these: Enthusiasts, small operators, community members with dedicated hardware
Lowest Tier
XNode
End-User PC or Mac only
- Role: Contributes storage from personal computer
- Function: Stores shards when device is online, earns tokens for contribution
- Hardware: PC or Mac desktop/laptop
- NOT available: On mobile version of ShardKeep extension
- Uptime requirement: Best-effort (earns proportional to uptime)
- Bond: Lowest (minimal barrier for end users)
- Earning: Lowest base rewards, accessible to all desktop users
- Who runs these: Regular ShardKeep users on PC/Mac
Naming convention is critical. Previous documents incorrectly used "Vault XNode" and "Operator XNode" as compound terms. The correct hierarchy is: Operator Node (highest) > Vault Node (medium) > XNode (lowest). "XNode" by itself always refers to the end-user PC/Mac tier. There is no such thing as a "Vault XNode" or "Operator XNode."
2. Token Overview
Core Parameters
| Parameter | Value | Notes |
|---|
| Token Name | SHARDKEEP | Single utility token |
| Network | Solana (SPL Token) | Low fees, high throughput |
| Total Supply | 1,000,000,000 (1 Billion) | Genesis mint + emissions |
| Genesis Supply | 400,000,000 (400M) | 40% minted at launch |
| Emissions Pool | 600,000,000 (600M) | Smart-contract-controlled, disinflationary |
| Maximum Cap | 1,000,000,000 | Hard cap, can never exceed |
| Burns | NONE | All collected tokens recirculate through Project Bank |
| Pricing Model | USD-denominated (oracle at mainnet) | Fixed token amounts at DevNet, oracle conversion at mainnet |
| Token System | Single token (not dual) | Simplicity at launch; Vault Credits remain a future option |
Why 1 Billion?
1. Zone A Accessibility
Target launch price: $0.001 per token (1/10th of a cent)
At $0.001, 1,000 tokens = $1.00
A Nigerian user receiving 5,000 tokens in an airdrop = $5.00
In PPP terms (5.8x multiplier) that $5.00 feels like $29.00
Low unit price makes bonds, fees, and subscriptions feel cheap and accessible
2. Psychological Value
• Receiving 5,000 tokens feels more valuable than receiving 5 tokens
• Zone A users (avg income $175-$336/mo) are more motivated by volume
• Community engagement metrics improve when rewards are denominated in larger numbers
3. Long-Term Flexibility
• v3 noted the velocity ceiling problem at 250M supply
• At 1M users, v3's Plan A needed tokens to circulate 9.4x/year — unsustainable
• 1B supply with emissions provides room for 20+ year growth
• Even at 10M users, a 1B supply keeps velocity under 5x/year
4. DePIN Precedent
• Helium: 223M HNT max supply (but burns + Data Credits)
• io.net: 800M total (500M launch + 300M emissions)
• Render Network: 530M total
• 1B is in range for DePIN utility tokens and avoids the scarcity trap
Price Trajectory
| Phase | Target Price | Fully Diluted Valuation | Context |
|---|
| DevNet launch | $0.001 | $1,000,000 | Micro-price, ultra-accessible |
| Year 1 (10K users) | $0.003 | $3,000,000 | Early growth, community building |
| Year 2-3 (100K users) | $0.01-0.02 | $10M-20M | Product-market fit established |
| Year 5 (1M users) | $0.03-0.05 | $30M-50M | Fee-based economy maturing |
| Year 10 (5M+ users) | $0.05-0.10 | $50M-100M | Emissions tapering, fee-driven |
3. Allocation Table
Genesis Allocation (400M — 40% of total)
| Allocation | Tokens | % of Genesis | % of Total | Purpose | Unlock Schedule |
|---|
| Community & Airdrops | 50,000,000 | 12.5% | 5% | 5% committed airdrop (quarterly schedule) | Wave 1 at TGE, Waves 2-5 quarterly |
| Project Bank (Treasury) | 120,000,000 | 30% | 12% | Insurance, subsidized storage, bounties, initial operator rewards | 40% at TGE, then 5% per quarter over 3 years |
| Team & Founders | 60,000,000 | 15% | 6% | Core team compensation | 0% at TGE; 1-year cliff, then linear over 4 years |
| Liquidity & Market Making | 40,000,000 | 10% | 4% | DEX liquidity pools, market stability | 100% at TGE (locked in LP) |
| Staking Bond Reserve | 60,000,000 | 15% | 6% | Backing for bond requirements as network grows | Released as nodes come online |
| Development Fund | 40,000,000 | 10% | 4% | Security audits, bug bounties, integrations | Governance-triggered; 10% at TGE for audit costs |
| Insurance Pool | 30,000,000 | 7.5% | 3% | Protocol failure compensation, slashing recovery | Locked; only released by governance vote for claims |
| Genesis Total | 400,000,000 | 100% | 40% | | |
Emissions Allocation (600M — 60% of total, over 20+ years)
| Allocation | Tokens | % of Emissions | % of Total | Purpose |
|---|
| Operator Node Rewards | 180,000,000 | 30% | 18% | Backbone infrastructure compensation |
| Vault Node Rewards | 150,000,000 | 25% | 15% | Shard storage and availability compensation |
| XNode Rewards | 90,000,000 | 15% | 9% | End-user PC/Mac contribution rewards |
| Protocol Incentives | 100,000,000 | 16.7% | 10% | Project Bank refill, growth campaigns, future airdrops |
| Staking Rewards | 80,000,000 | 13.3% | 8% | Additional yield for bond holders (all three node tiers) |
| Emissions Total | 600,000,000 | 100% | 60% | |
Combined Allocation (1B Total)
| Category | Tokens | % of Total Supply | Source |
|---|
| Node Rewards (Operator + Vault + XNode) | 420,000,000 | 42% | Emissions |
| Project Bank / Treasury | 220,000,000 | 22% | 120M Genesis + 100M Emissions |
| Staking (Bond Reserve + Staking Rewards) | 140,000,000 | 14% | 60M Genesis + 80M Emissions |
| Team & Founders | 60,000,000 | 6% | Genesis |
| Community & Airdrops | 50,000,000 | 5% | Genesis |
| Liquidity & Market Making | 40,000,000 | 4% | Genesis |
| Development Fund | 40,000,000 | 4% | Genesis |
| Insurance Pool | 30,000,000 | 3% | Genesis |
| TOTAL | 1,000,000,000 | 100% | |
Genesis Vesting Schedule
| Category | TGE | Month 3 | Month 6 | Month 12 | Month 24 | Month 48 |
|---|
| Community/Airdrops (50M) | 10M | 20M | 30M | 40M | 50M | 50M |
| Project Bank (120M) | 48M | 63M | 78M | 108M | 120M | 120M |
| Team (60M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20M | 50M |
| Liquidity (40M) | 40M | 40M | 40M | 40M | 40M | 40M |
| Staking Reserve (60M) | 5M | 10M | 15M | 25M | 40M | 60M |
| Development (40M) | 4M | 6M | 10M | 16M | 28M | 40M |
| Insurance (30M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Genesis Circulating | 107M | 139M | 173M | 229M | 298M | 360M |
| % of Genesis (400M) | 26.8% | 34.8% | 43.3% | 57.3% | 74.5% | 90% |
| % of Total (1B) | 10.7% | 13.9% | 17.3% | 22.9% | 29.8% | 36% |
Insurance Pool (30M) remains locked in escrow and is never counted as circulating unless released by governance for a valid claim. Team has a hard 1-year cliff — no insider selling before community establishes a price floor.
4. Airdrop Schedule — 5% of Total Supply (50M tokens)
The marketing team has committed 5% of total supply (50,000,000 tokens) for airdrops. These are structured across 5 waves: one immediate distribution at launch, followed by four quarterly waves channeled through the external rewards/points platform.
Wave Schedule
| Wave | Timing | Tokens | % of Supply | Distribution Method | Recipient Pool |
|---|
| Wave 1 |
Token Generation Event (TGE) |
10,000,000 |
1% |
Direct airdrop to wallets |
Current participants, early community members, DevNet testers |
| Wave 2 |
Q1 after launch |
10,000,000 |
1% |
Via rewards/points platform |
Points holders; distribution proportional to points collected |
| Wave 3 |
Q2 after launch |
10,000,000 |
1% |
Via rewards/points platform |
Points holders; distribution proportional to points collected |
| Wave 4 |
Q3 after launch |
10,000,000 |
1% |
Via rewards/points platform |
Points holders; distribution proportional to points collected |
| Wave 5 |
Q4 after launch |
10,000,000 |
1% |
Via rewards/points platform |
Points holders; distribution proportional to points collected |
| TOTAL | | 50,000,000 | 5% | | |
How Waves 2-5 Work Through the Points System
POINTS PLATFORM FLOW:
1. Users earn points on the external rewards platform
• Complete tasks, engage with community, refer users
• Points accumulate in the user's rewards account
2. Quarterly snapshot
• At end of each quarter, total points across all users are tallied
• Each user's share = their_points / total_points
3. Distribution
• 10,000,000 tokens distributed proportional to point shares
• Example: user has 0.1% of all points → receives 10,000 tokens
• Tokens are subject to vesting (see below)
Points are NOT consumed. They accumulate and determine share size each quarter.
This rewards consistent engagement, not just one-time activity.
Token Vesting from Rewards Platform
Users claiming tokens through the rewards platform choose their vesting period. Longer vesting = full claim. Shorter vesting = partial claim (remainder stays in Project Bank).
| Vesting Period | Claim % | Example: 10,000 Tokens Earned | Tokens Received | Tokens to Project Bank |
|---|
| 1 year | 100% | Claim all 10,000 | 10,000 (locked 12 months) | 0 |
| 6 months | 50% | Claim 5,000, forfeit 5,000 | 5,000 (locked 6 months) | 5,000 |
| 3 months | 25% | Claim 2,500, forfeit 7,500 | 2,500 (locked 3 months) | 7,500 |
Vesting economics (system level):
If all 10M tokens in Wave 2 are claimed:
• Scenario A (all users choose 1yr vest): 10M distributed, 0 to Project Bank
• Scenario B (all users choose 6mo vest): 5M distributed, 5M returned to Project Bank
• Scenario C (all users choose 3mo vest): 2.5M distributed, 7.5M returned to Project Bank
• Realistic mix (30% 1yr, 40% 6mo, 30% 3mo):
= 3M + 2M + 0.75M = 5.75M distributed, 4.25M returned to Project Bank
Effect: Short-term takers subsidize long-term holders.
Project Bank recaptures 30-75% of each wave, extending sustainability.
Users who need tokens NOW (for bonds/Guardian) take the discount.
Users who believe in the project vest 1 year for full value.
Zone A Airdrop Design Critical
Zone A countries (Nigeria, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh) represent the largest crypto adoption markets with the lowest purchasing power. The first airdrop (Wave 1) must cover:
Zone A First Airdrop Must Cover:
1. XNode bond (to participate in the network)
2. First month Guardian subscription (to access 2FA backup wallet)
3. Remaining tokens vest over time (covering 150% of Guardian fee per month)
Working backwards from costs (at $0.001/token launch price):
XNode bond: 10,000 SHARDKEEP = $10.00
Guardian monthly subscription: 1,500 SHARDKEEP = $1.50
(Guardian target: $1.50/month, earnable via points)
Minimum Zone A airdrop per user:
• XNode bond: 10,000 tokens
• First month Guardian: 1,500 tokens
• Subtotal (immediately usable): 11,500 tokens = $11.50
Remaining tokens vest (150% of Guardian monthly):
• 150% of Guardian fee = 1,500 × 1.5 = 2,250 tokens/month
• After bond + first month, remaining vest covers ongoing Guardian fees
• Target: 6 months of vesting coverage = 2,250 × 6 = 13,500 tokens
• Total Zone A airdrop per user: 25,000 tokens = $25.00
What this gets a Zone A user:
• Free XNode bond (network participation)
• Free Guardian subscription for first month
• 13,500 vesting tokens that cover 6 months of Guardian (at 150% — surplus each month)
• Monthly surplus: 2,250 - 1,500 = 750 tokens/month to invest, hold, or sell
• Over 6 months: 750 × 6 = 4,500 surplus tokens = $4.50 free value
Zone A Airdrop Budget
Wave 1 capacity for Zone A users at 25,000 tokens each:
• Wave 1 total: 10,000,000 tokens
• Zone A allocation (targeting 50% of Wave 1): 5,000,000 tokens
• Zone A users served: 5,000,000 / 25,000 = 200 Zone A users
Remaining Wave 1 (non-Zone A, lighter airdrop):
• 5,000,000 tokens for ~1,300 other participants
• ~3,846 tokens each ($3.85) — covers tx fees for months
Waves 2-5 Zone A scaling (through points):
• Zone A users who are active on the points platform earn larger shares
• Each quarterly wave: 10M tokens distributed by points
• As community grows to 10K users, Zone A users receiving top-quartile points
could earn 5,000-15,000 tokens per quarter
• With 1yr vesting: covers 3-10 months of Guardian subscription
Note: 200 Zone A users in Wave 1 is the floor.
As token price increases and DevNet proves the model, subsequent waves
adjust amounts. At $0.003/token, the same 25K tokens = $75 in value.
5. Staking Bonds by Node Type
Bond Requirements
Bonds are USD-denominated and paid in SHARDKEEP at the current rate. At DevNet launch (fixed token pricing), bonds are set in tokens. At mainnet (oracle pricing), bonds are calculated automatically.
| Node Tier | Bond (USD) | At $0.001 | At $0.003 | At $0.01 | At $0.05 | Returnable? |
|---|
| Operator Node |
$500 |
500,000 SHARDKEEP |
166,667 SHARDKEEP |
50,000 SHARDKEEP |
10,000 SHARDKEEP |
Yes, on graceful exit |
| Vault Node |
$100 |
100,000 SHARDKEEP |
33,333 SHARDKEEP |
10,000 SHARDKEEP |
2,000 SHARDKEEP |
Yes, on graceful exit |
| XNode |
$10 |
10,000 SHARDKEEP |
3,333 SHARDKEEP |
1,000 SHARDKEEP |
200 SHARDKEEP |
Yes, on graceful exit |
Zone A airdrop covers XNode bond. At launch ($0.001), the XNode bond is 10,000 SHARDKEEP ($10). Zone A users receive 25,000 SHARDKEEP in their airdrop, of which 10,000 goes directly to the XNode bond. The user pays nothing out of pocket.
Bond Lifecycle
1. Operator stakes bond:
Operator Node: $500 equivalent in SHARDKEEP
Vault Node: $100 equivalent in SHARDKEEP
XNode: $10 equivalent in SHARDKEEP
Tokens locked in escrow smart contract
2. Node operates (normal):
Bond remains locked, earns staking yield from emissions
Operator earns rewards for uptime, shards, heartbeats
Bond is NOT consumed — it is collateral
3a. Graceful exit:
Operator announces shutdown (7-day notice for Operator/Vault, 48h for XNode)
Shards redistributed to other nodes
After redistribution confirmed: 100% of bond returned
3b. Slashing (bad behavior):
• Serving corrupt shard data: 100% slash
• Extended unannounced downtime (>72h): 25% slash
• Failed heartbeat proofs (>50% in 30 days): 10% slash
• Collusion attempt (detected via anomaly): 100% slash
Slashed tokens → Project Bank (recirculated, not burned)
Hardware failure with proper shutdown notification: no slashing.
XNodes have lighter penalties (25% slash cap) given best-effort uptime model.
Tokens Locked in Bonds — Projections
Year 1 (10,000 users):
• 50 Operator Nodes × 500,000 = 25,000,000 tokens
• 200 Vault Nodes × 100,000 = 20,000,000 tokens
• 2,000 XNodes × 10,000 = 20,000,000 tokens
• Total locked: 65,000,000 tokens (6.5% of supply)
Year 3 (100,000 users):
• 200 Operator Nodes × 166,667 = 33,333,400 tokens
• 800 Vault Nodes × 33,333 = 26,666,400 tokens
• 15,000 XNodes × 3,333 = 49,995,000 tokens
• Total locked: ~110,000,000 tokens (11% of supply)
(Bond amounts in tokens decrease as price rises from $0.001 to $0.003)
Year 5 (1,000,000 users):
• 500 Operator Nodes × 50,000 = 25,000,000 tokens
• 3,000 Vault Nodes × 10,000 = 30,000,000 tokens
• 100,000 XNodes × 1,000 = 100,000,000 tokens
• Total locked: ~155,000,000 tokens (15.5% of supply)
(At $0.01, XNode bond is only 1,000 tokens = very accessible)
6. Emission Schedule (Spring Model)
Adapted from v3's Plan B "The Spring" model, scaled to a 1B total supply with 600M emission pool. Smart-contract-controlled mint with no admin key. Starting rate of 8%, halving every 4 years.
Year-by-Year Emissions
| Year | Rate | Remaining Pool | Tokens Emitted | Cumulative Emissions | Total Supply | % of 1B Cap |
|---|
| 1 | 8% | 600,000,000 | 48,000,000 | 48,000,000 | 448,000,000 | 44.8% |
| 2 | 8% | 552,000,000 | 44,160,000 | 92,160,000 | 492,160,000 | 49.2% |
| 3 | 8% | 507,840,000 | 40,627,200 | 132,787,200 | 532,787,200 | 53.3% |
| 4 | 8% | 467,212,800 | 37,377,024 | 170,164,224 | 570,164,224 | 57.0% |
| 5 | 4% | 429,835,776 | 17,193,431 | 187,357,655 | 587,357,655 | 58.7% |
| 6 | 4% | 412,642,345 | 16,505,694 | 203,863,349 | 603,863,349 | 60.4% |
| 7 | 4% | 396,136,651 | 15,845,466 | 219,708,815 | 619,708,815 | 62.0% |
| 8 | 4% | 380,291,185 | 15,211,647 | 234,920,462 | 634,920,462 | 63.5% |
| 10 | 2% | 350,748,023 | 7,014,960 | 256,266,937 | 656,266,937 | 65.6% |
| 15 | 1% | 310,850,000 | 3,108,500 | 289,150,000 | 689,150,000 | 68.9% |
| 20 | 1% | 295,600,000 | 2,956,000 | 304,400,000 | 704,400,000 | 70.4% |
At 20 years, approximately 50.7% of the 600M emission pool has been distributed. The remaining ~296M tokens continue emitting at 1%/year indefinitely, asymptotically approaching but never reaching the 1B cap. This ensures perpetual operator rewards.
How Emissions Fund Each Node Tier
Year 1 emission: 48,000,000 tokens distributed as:
• Operator Node Rewards (30%): 14,400,000 tokens
• Vault Node Rewards (25%): 12,000,000 tokens
• XNode Rewards (15%): 7,200,000 tokens
• Protocol Incentives (16.7%): 8,016,000 tokens → Project Bank refill
• Staking Rewards (13.3%): 6,384,000 tokens → bond holder yield
Per-node monthly earnings (Year 1, 50 Operator / 200 Vault / 2,000 XNode):
• Operator Node: 14,400,000 / 50 / 12 = 24,000 tokens/month = $24 at $0.001
• Vault Node: 12,000,000 / 200 / 12 = 5,000 tokens/month = $5 at $0.001
• XNode: 7,200,000 / 2,000 / 12 = 300 tokens/month = $0.30 at $0.001
Year 1 earnings are low in USD because token price is $0.001.
At $0.003 (Year 1 target), Operator earns $72/mo, Vault $15/mo, XNode $0.90/mo.
At $0.01 (Year 2-3), Operator earns $240/mo, Vault $50/mo, XNode $3.00/mo.
Early operators earn more tokens at low prices; token appreciation multiplies value.
Emission Transition to Fee-Based Economy
PHASE 1 (Years 1-4): Emission-Dominant
• 8% annual emissions provide primary operator compensation
• Fee recycling is small (low user count)
• Emissions cover 80%+ of operator rewards
PHASE 2 (Years 5-8): Mixed Economy
• 4% annual emissions (halved)
• Fee recycling growing rapidly with user base
• ~50/50 split between emissions and fee revenue
PHASE 3 (Years 9+): Fee-Dominant
• 2% then 1% annual emissions (safety net)
• Fee recycling provides 80%+ of operator rewards
• Emissions serve as a baseline guarantee, not primary income
The system transitions naturally from emission-driven to fee-driven.
7. Guardian Subscription Pricing
Guardian subscription is USD-denominated at $1.50/month. At DevNet launch, a fixed token amount is used. At mainnet, an on-chain oracle (Pyth/Switchboard) calculates the SHARDKEEP amount automatically.
Guardian Cost at Various Token Prices
| Token Price | Tokens / Month | USD Cost | Affordable? | Context |
|---|
| $0.001 (launch) | 1,500 SHARDKEEP | $1.50 | Very affordable | Zone A PPP: feels like $5.70-$8.70 — still very accessible |
| $0.003 (Year 1) | 500 SHARDKEEP | $1.50 | Target range | Earnable in 30-60 days via rewards platform |
| $0.01 (Year 2-3) | 150 SHARDKEEP | $1.50 | Stable | Fewer tokens, same dollar cost |
| $0.05 (Year 5) | 30 SHARDKEEP | $1.50 | Stable | Oracle keeps it exactly $1.50 |
| $0.10 (Year 10) | 15 SHARDKEEP | $1.50 | Stable | Still $1.50 regardless of price |
v3 problem solved: Plan A in v3 showed Guardian breaking at $0.10/token ($15/month at fixed 150-token cost). With USD-denominated pricing, Guardian is always $1.50/month regardless of token appreciation. The oracle adjusts the token amount automatically. Users see "$1.50/month" in their interface, paid in whatever number of SHARDKEEP tokens that equals today.
How the Rewards Platform Covers Guardian
Points platform airdrop (Waves 2-5) Guardian coverage:
Assume a Zone A user earns average points and receives 8,000 tokens per quarter
With 6-month vesting (50% claim): receives 4,000 tokens per quarter
At $0.003/token (Year 1):
• 4,000 tokens = $12.00 per quarter
• Guardian cost: $1.50 × 3 months = $4.50 per quarter
• Surplus: $7.50 per quarter ($2.50/month free value)
At $0.01/token (Year 2):
• 4,000 tokens = $40.00 per quarter
• Guardian cost: $4.50 per quarter
• Surplus: $35.50 per quarter ($11.83/month free value)
Even at minimum engagement, the rewards platform covers Guardian
and provides meaningful surplus in Zone A purchasing power terms.
Zone A Guardian Example: Nigerian User Journey
MONTH 0: TGE Airdrop (Wave 1)
User receives 25,000 SHARDKEEP airdrop
→ 10,000 tokens locked as XNode bond (now earning rewards)
→ 1,500 tokens pay first month Guardian subscription
→ 13,500 tokens vesting over 6 months (2,250/month released)
MONTHS 1-6: Covered by Airdrop Vesting
Each month: 2,250 tokens vest
Guardian costs: 1,500 tokens/month
Surplus: 750 tokens/month = $0.75 at $0.001
XNode earns: ~300 tokens/month from emissions
Total surplus: 1,050 tokens/month
MONTH 3: Wave 2 Airdrop (via points)
User has been active on points platform
Receives additional tokens from quarterly distribution
These tokens extend coverage beyond 6 months
MONTH 7+: Self-Sustaining
Airdrop vesting exhausted, but:
• XNode rewards: ~300 tokens/month
• Wave 2 vesting: additional tokens releasing
• Points platform: earning towards Wave 3
• Accumulated surplus: ~6,300 tokens saved
User is self-sustaining without spending any local currency
8. Fee Structure
Transaction fees are denominated in USD and paid in SHARDKEEP. Fees are intentionally tiny — the goal is near-zero friction for vault operations. All collected fees flow to the Project Bank for recirculation.
Operation Fees
| Operation | USD Cost | At $0.001 | At $0.003 | At $0.01 | At $0.05 |
|---|
| Vault unlock (shard reconstruction) | $0.001 | 1 SHARDKEEP | 0.33 SHARDKEEP | 0.1 SHARDKEEP | 0.02 SHARDKEEP |
| Password add/update | $0.0005 | 0.5 SHARDKEEP | 0.17 SHARDKEEP | 0.05 SHARDKEEP | 0.01 SHARDKEEP |
| Shard rotation trigger | $0.002 | 2 SHARDKEEP | 0.67 SHARDKEEP | 0.2 SHARDKEEP | 0.04 SHARDKEEP |
| Recovery initiation | $0.005 | 5 SHARDKEEP | 1.67 SHARDKEEP | 0.5 SHARDKEEP | 0.1 SHARDKEEP |
| Audit log write | $0.0002 | 0.2 SHARDKEEP | 0.07 SHARDKEEP | 0.02 SHARDKEEP | 0.004 SHARDKEEP |
Monthly Cost per User (Fees Only, Excluding Subscription)
Shield user (free tier):
• ~90 vault unlocks + 5 password changes = 90 + 2.5 = 92.5 SHARDKEEP/month at $0.001
• Monthly fee cost: $0.093 (less than a dime)
Guardian user:
• ~90 unlocks + 5 adds + 4 rotations + 90 audit logs
• = 90 + 2.5 + 8 + 18 = 118.5 SHARDKEEP/month at $0.001
• Monthly fee cost: $0.119 (plus $1.50 subscription = $1.62 total)
Sentinel user:
• ~90 unlocks + 5 adds + 30 rotations + 90 audit logs
• = 90 + 2.5 + 60 + 18 = 170.5 SHARDKEEP/month at $0.001
• Monthly fee cost: $0.171 (plus $3 USDC subscription = $3.17 total)
Transaction fees are negligible relative to subscriptions.
Shield user airdrop of ~5,000 tokens covers ~54 months of tx fees at $0.001.
Aggregate Fee Revenue Projections
| Users | Phase | Avg Fees/User/Month | Monthly Fee Revenue | Annual Fee Revenue | Tokens/Year at $0.001 |
|---|
| 1,500 | DevNet | 100 SHARDKEEP | 150,000 SHARDKEEP ($150) | $1,800 | 1,800,000 |
| 10,000 | Year 1 | 100 SHARDKEEP | 1,000,000 SHARDKEEP ($1,000) | $12,000 | 12,000,000 |
| 100,000 | Year 3 | 120 SHARDKEEP | 12,000,000 SHARDKEEP ($36,000) | $432,000 | 144,000,000 |
| 1,000,000 | Year 5 | 130 SHARDKEEP | 130,000,000 SHARDKEEP ($1.3M) | $15,600,000 | 1,560,000,000 |
At scale (1M users, Year 5), the same tokens circulate multiple times through Project Bank. Annual fee volume of 1.56B tokens on a ~700M total supply means ~2.2x velocity — very healthy and sustainable.
9. Scaling Projections
| Metric |
1,500 Users
DevNet Launch |
10,000 Users
Year 1 |
100,000 Users
Year 2-3 |
1,000,000 Users
Year 5 |
| Target token price | $0.001 | $0.003 | $0.01 | $0.03-0.05 |
| Total supply (genesis + emitted) | 400M | 448M | 533M | 587M |
| Genesis circulating | 107M | 229M | 340M | 390M |
| Cumulative emissions | 0 | 48M | 133M | 187M |
| Tokens locked in bonds | 3M | 65M | 110M | 155M |
| Project Bank balance | ~48M | ~85M | ~120M | ~95M |
| Freely circulating | ~56M | ~127M | ~243M | ~327M |
| Monthly new emissions | 4.0M | 4.0M | 3.4M | 1.4M |
| Monthly fee recycling | 150K | 1M | 12M | 130M |
| Monthly Guardian subs (tokens) | 45K | 300K | 3M | 27M |
| Monthly operator payouts | 2.8M | 3.5M | 6.5M | 20M |
| Fully diluted valuation | $1M | $3M | $10-20M | $30-50M |
| Token velocity (annual) | 0.5x | 1.2x | 2.8x | 4.5x |
| Operator Nodes | 10 | 50 | 200 | 500 |
| Vault Nodes | 50 | 200 | 800 | 3,000 |
| XNodes | 200 | 2,000 | 15,000 | 100,000 |
Token Supply vs. Demand at Scale
Year 1 (10,000 users, $0.003/token):
• Monthly token demand: fees (1M) + subs (300K) + bonds (5.4M new) = ~6.7M
• Monthly token supply: emissions (4M) + Project Bank payouts (3.5M) = ~7.5M
• Supply slightly exceeds demand — healthy for keeping price accessible
Year 3 (100,000 users, $0.01/token):
• Monthly token demand: fees (12M) + subs (3M) + bonds (3.7M new) = ~18.7M
• Monthly token supply: emissions (3.4M) + Project Bank recycling (12M) = ~15.4M
• Demand exceeds supply — price appreciation pressure begins
Year 5 (1,000,000 users, $0.03-0.05/token):
• Monthly token demand: fees (130M) + subs (27M) + bonds (8.5M new) = ~165.5M
• Monthly token supply: emissions (1.4M) + Project Bank recycling (130M) = ~131.4M
• High velocity required (4.5x/year) but manageable with 327M freely circulating
• Compare to v3 Plan A at Year 5: 9.4x velocity needed — nearly unsustainable
10. Perpetuity Analysis
Year 5 Checkpoint
Total supply: ~587M (400M genesis + 187M emitted)
Emission rate: ~17.2M tokens/year (slowing from 4% annual)
Fee recycling: ~1.56B tokens/year flowing through Project Bank
Locked in bonds: ~155M (26% of supply)
Freely circulating: ~327M
Velocity: 4.5x — each free token cycles ~4.5 times per year
Healthy: fee recycling dominates, emissions still supplementing
Year 10 Projection
Total supply: ~656M (400M genesis + 256M emitted)
Emission rate: ~7.0M tokens/year (2% of shrinking pool)
Fee recycling: Tens of billions of tokens/year at scale
Locked in bonds: ~200M+ (30%+ of supply)
Project Bank: Continuously refilled from fee recycling + emission trickle
Key dynamics at Year 10:
• Emissions provide <5% of operator compensation
• Fee recycling provides >95% of operator compensation
• Project Bank acts as a flywheel: fees in → rewards out → fees in
• Sustainable: dual income streams keep the bank solvent
Year 20 Projection
Total supply: ~704M (400M genesis + 304M emitted)
Emission rate: ~2.96M tokens/year (1% of remaining ~296M pool)
Remaining emission pool: ~296M tokens (still releasing at 1%/year)
Critical comparison to v3:
• v3 Plan A (250M fixed): at Year 20 needed 45x velocity — UNSUSTAINABLE
• v3 Plan B (500M cap): at Year 20 had ~353M supply, 1.82M/year emissions
• v3.1 (1B cap): at Year 20 has ~704M supply, 2.96M/year emissions
• 2x the supply headroom of v3 Plan B, with proportionally larger emission runway
Year 20 sustainability:
• ~296M tokens still in emission pool, perpetually releasing
• Fee recycling provides 99%+ of the economy
• Emissions serve as an insurance floor for operator rewards
• The system is fee-driven with emission safety net
Asymptotic Behavior (Year 50+)
Mathematical trajectory:
• Emission pool approaches zero asymptotically (never actually reaches it)
• At 1%/year of remaining pool, half-life is ~69 years from Year 13 onward
• By Year 50: ~250M emitted, ~350M remaining in pool
• By Year 100: ~320M emitted, ~280M remaining in pool
• Total supply never exceeds ~750M even after 100 years
The 1B cap is never reached. Effective long-term supply settles around 700-750M.
This creates natural scarcity without the rigid constraints of a fixed supply.
11. Zone A Accessibility Analysis
Zone A countries are defined by their combination of high crypto adoption and low purchasing power. The entire tokenomics model must work for these users without requiring any out-of-pocket spending at launch.
Zone A Country Data
| Country | Crypto Adoption Rank | Avg Monthly Income | Min Wage/Month | PPP Multiplier | Crypto Users |
|---|
| Nigeria | #6 | $220 | $47 | 5.8x | 47% own crypto |
| Pakistan | #3 | $175 | $114 | 4.2x | 18.2M users |
| India | #1 | $336 | $200 | 3.6x | 93M users |
| Bangladesh | #13 | $213 | $115 | 3.8x | Growing |
Nigerian User: Full First 6 Months Walkthrough
USER PROFILE: Nigerian end-user, PC/Mac, minimum-wage worker ($47/month)
Token price at launch: $0.001
=== MONTH 0: AIRDROP (Wave 1) ===
Receives: 25,000 SHARDKEEP (worth $25.00)
In PPP terms (5.8x): feels like receiving $145 worth of value
That is 3.1x their monthly minimum wage in perceived value
Immediate actions:
• Stake 10,000 SHARDKEEP as XNode bond ($10) → Now earning XNode rewards
• Pay 1,500 SHARDKEEP for first month Guardian ($1.50) → 2FA backup wallet unlocked
• Remaining: 13,500 SHARDKEEP vesting over 6 months (2,250/month)
=== MONTH 1 ===
Vest: 2,250 tokens
Guardian cost: 1,500 tokens
XNode earnings: ~300 tokens
Tx fees (light usage): ~50 tokens
Net surplus: 2,250 - 1,500 + 300 - 50 = +1,000 tokens saved
Running balance: 1,000 tokens
=== MONTH 2 ===
Same pattern: +1,000 tokens surplus
Running balance: 2,000 tokens
=== MONTH 3 (Wave 2 Airdrop) ===
Vest: 2,250 tokens + surplus pattern = +1,000
PLUS: Wave 2 distribution via points platform
Assume average engagement: receives 5,000 tokens (1yr vest)
• Wave 2 tokens start vesting: ~417 tokens/month for 12 months
Running balance: 3,000 + 417 = 3,417 tokens
=== MONTHS 4-6 ===
Each month: +1,000 (airdrop vest surplus) + 417 (Wave 2 vest) = +1,417/month
Month 6 running balance: 3,417 + (1,417 × 3) = 7,668 tokens
=== MONTH 7+ (Post-Airdrop Vesting) ===
Wave 1 vesting exhausted. New income:
• XNode rewards: 300 tokens/month
• Wave 2 vesting: 417 tokens/month (9 months remaining)
• Saved balance: 7,668 tokens
Monthly net: 300 + 417 - 1,500 - 50 = -833 tokens/month deficit
BUT: 7,668 / 833 = 9.2 months of runway from savings alone
Wave 3 (Q2) arrives at Month 6 with another 5,000-10,000 tokens
User is perpetually covered through waves + XNode rewards + savings
Zone A Comparison Table
| Metric | Nigeria | Pakistan | India | Bangladesh |
|---|
| Monthly minimum wage | $47 | $114 | $200 | $115 |
| PPP multiplier | 5.8x | 4.2x | 3.6x | 3.8x |
| Airdrop value (25K tokens @ $0.001) | $25 | $25 | $25 | $25 |
| PPP-adjusted airdrop value | $145 | $105 | $90 | $95 |
| Airdrop as % of monthly min wage | 53% | 22% | 13% | 22% |
| XNode bond ($10 cost in PPP terms) | $58 | $42 | $36 | $38 |
| Guardian monthly ($1.50 in PPP terms) | $8.70 | $6.30 | $5.40 | $5.70 |
| Months of Guardian covered by airdrop | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Monthly surplus tokens after Guardian | +1,000 | +1,000 | +1,000 | +1,000 |
| 6-month surplus (USD) | $4.50 | $4.50 | $4.50 | $4.50 |
| 6-month surplus (PPP-adjusted) | $26.10 | $18.90 | $16.20 | $17.10 |
Zone A validation: In every Zone A country, the 25,000 SHARDKEEP airdrop covers the XNode bond, first month Guardian, and provides 150%+ of Guardian fees for 6 months through vesting. The PPP-adjusted surplus ($16-26) is meaningful in all four markets. Users participate in the network, secure their vault with 2FA, and accumulate surplus tokens — all without spending any local currency.
What If Token Price Rises Before Zone A Distribution?
If price hits $0.003 before Zone A airdrop waves:
• XNode bond: 3,333 SHARDKEEP ($10) instead of 10,000
• Guardian monthly: 500 SHARDKEEP ($1.50) instead of 1,500
• Airdrop amount adjustable: could be 10,000 tokens = $30 total
• Covers bond (3,333) + first month (500) + 6 months vest at 150%: 6,167 tokens
• At higher prices, fewer tokens needed per user = more users served per wave
Wave 2 at $0.003 (10M tokens):
• Zone A users need ~10,000 tokens each
• 50% allocation to Zone A: 5,000,000 / 10,000 = 500 Zone A users
• vs. 200 at $0.001 — price appreciation actually helps distribution reach
12. Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Severity | Mitigation |
|---|
| Token price crashes below $0.001 |
High |
At $0.0005, all airdrop amounts double in token terms but halve in value. Bond amounts double. Guardian costs 3,000 tokens/month. Project Bank must fund the gap. Mitigation: emissions provide guaranteed baseline; reduce operator node targets to match demand. |
| Emissions create sustained sell pressure |
Medium |
Expected and desired in early years. Moderate price = affordable subscriptions. Operator reward vesting (7-day release) prevents instant dumping. Price stabilizes as fee recycling overtakes emissions. |
| Mint authority compromise |
Critical |
Mint controlled by immutable smart contract with no admin key. Emission schedule is hardcoded. Multiple security audits before mainnet. Bug bounty program funded from Development Fund. |
| Oracle manipulation (mainnet pricing) |
High |
Multiple oracle sources (Pyth + Switchboard) with TWAP fallback. Price bounds: if oracle reports >5x deviation from 24h TWAP, circuit breaker activates and falls back to previous price. |
| Airdrop farming / Sybil attacks |
High |
Wave 1 is curated (current participants, known wallets). Waves 2-5 go through points platform which has its own anti-Sybil measures. Device fingerprinting + wallet age requirements. |
| Zone A users sell airdrop immediately |
Medium |
XNode bond is locked (not sellable). Guardian subscription is consumed. Only the vesting surplus can be sold, and it releases over 6 months. The vesting structure naturally limits sell pressure. |
| Project Bank depletion |
Medium |
Project Bank receives: fee recycling (growing with users) + emission protocol incentives (16.7% of emissions) + slashing penalties + short-vesting forfeitures. Multiple inflow streams make depletion unlikely unless user growth stalls completely. |
| XNode rewards too low to attract end users |
Medium |
At $0.001, XNode earns $0.30/month — trivial. But XNode participation is bundled with the ShardKeep experience (like Brave browser paying BAT for attention). Users run XNodes because they already use the vault, not as primary income. Bootstrap multiplier (2x) for first 6 months. |
| Regulatory classification as security |
Medium |
SHARDKEEP is a utility token: required for vault operations, subscriptions, and node bonds. No profit-sharing, no dividends, no equity. Emissions are work-based (node operators earn for actual service). Follows Howey test utility exemption patterns. |
| 1B supply perceived as "too many tokens" |
Low |
Many successful tokens have 1B+ supply (SOL: 580M+, MATIC: 10B, DOGE: 148B). Low unit price is a feature for Zone A markets. Frame as "accessible" not "diluted." |
| Complexity of emission + recycling + vesting |
Medium |
Users never see the complexity. UI shows: "Guardian: $1.50/month" and "Your XNode earned $X this month." All emission/recycling mechanics are backend infrastructure. Community docs explain it for node operators and token holders. |
13. Summary
Key Metrics at a Glance
| Parameter | Value |
|---|
| Total supply | 1,000,000,000 SHARDKEEP |
| Genesis supply | 400,000,000 (40%) |
| Emission pool | 600,000,000 (60%, over 20+ years) |
| Network | Solana SPL Token |
| Burns | None — all tokens recirculate through Project Bank |
| Launch price target | $0.001 |
| Fully diluted valuation at launch | $1,000,000 |
| Airdrop allocation | 5% (50M tokens) across 5 quarterly waves |
| Zone A airdrop per user | 25,000 SHARDKEEP ($25) — covers bond + Guardian + surplus |
| Guardian subscription | $1.50/month (USD-denominated, paid in SHARDKEEP) |
| XNode bond | $10 equivalent (covered by Zone A airdrop) |
| Vault Node bond | $100 equivalent |
| Operator Node bond | $500 equivalent |
| Team allocation | 6% (60M tokens) with 1-year cliff, 4-year vesting |
| Node rewards (all tiers) | 42% of total supply (emissions-funded) |
| Emission start rate | 8% of remaining pool/year |
| Emission halving | Every 4 years (8% → 4% → 2% → 1%) |
| Year 5 total supply | ~587M (59% of cap) |
| Year 20 total supply | ~704M (70% of cap) |
| Year 20 emission pool remaining | ~296M (perpetually releasing at 1%/year) |
| Fee-dominant economy transition | Year 5-8 (fee recycling exceeds emission rewards) |
Model Summary
This is the hybrid model recommended in v3 (Plan B Spring + Plan C USD-pricing), adapted to a 1 billion total supply for Zone A accessibility. Key design decisions:
- Single token, not dual: One SHARDKEEP token with USD-denominated pricing. No Vault Credits at launch. Simplicity wins.
- Smart-contract emissions: No admin key, no manual minting. The emission schedule is immutable code.
- USD-denominated everything: Bonds, subscriptions, and fees are priced in USD. SHARDKEEP amounts adjust automatically via oracle (mainnet) or fixed rates (DevNet).
- 5% airdrop commitment: Marketing-committed allocation, structured across 5 quarterly waves with points-based distribution.
- Zone A first: Every airdrop design decision works backwards from "does a Nigerian minimum-wage worker get free XNode bond + Guardian + surplus?"
- No burns, ever: All collected tokens recirculate through Project Bank. This is a closed-loop economy, not a deflationary spiral.
- Perpetual sustainability: Emission pool never fully depletes (asymptotic 1%/year). Fee recycling becomes the primary economy by Year 5-8. The system runs forever.
Bottom line: 1B tokens at $0.001 launch price creates an ultra-accessible entry point for 560M+ crypto users in emerging markets. Zone A users can participate in the network, secure their vaults, and accumulate surplus value — all funded by their airdrop alone. The emission model provides 20+ years of guaranteed operator rewards, transitioning naturally to a fee-driven economy. USD-denominated pricing ensures subscriptions stay at $1.50 regardless of token price. This is a tokenomics model designed for a global, community-first, perpetually sustainable decentralized password manager.
14. Sources & References
| Source | Key Insight Applied | Relevance to v3.1 |
|---|
Helium Network (HNT + Data Credits)
helium.com/token |
Dual-token system: HNT for value/governance, Data Credits for operations. Burns HNT to create DC. |
Inspired Plan C in v3. v3.1 keeps the USD-pricing concept but uses single token. The dual-token option remains a future Phase 3 upgrade if needed at scale. |
io.net Tokenomics
io.net/docs/tokenomics |
800M total, 500M at launch, 300M as hourly rewards over 20 years at 8% starting disinflationary rate. |
Primary inspiration for emission model. v3.1 scales to 1B total (400M genesis + 600M emissions) with same halving structure. Ratio adapted for heavier operator incentives. |
Akash Network
akash.network/token |
Fixed 388M cap. Compute marketplace with staking rewards. USD-denominated service pricing. |
Validated USD-denominated service pricing for DePIN. Demonstrated that fixed supply needs inflation-like mechanism (staking rewards) to sustain operator incentives. |
Silencio Network
silencio.network |
100M supply. 7.5% airdrop to early users. Community-first distribution with 60%+ to network participants. |
Validated large community allocation and airdrop-first strategy. v3.1 allocates 42% to node operators + 5% airdrops = 47% community/operator distribution. |
Global Equivalent Costs Evaluation
eval-global-equivalent-costs.html |
PPP analysis showing $3/month costs $17.40 equivalent in Nigeria (5.8x), $12.60 in Pakistan (4.2x), $10.80 in India (3.6x), $11.40 in Bangladesh (3.8x). |
Directly drove the 1B supply decision and Zone A airdrop design. Every pricing calculation uses PPP multipliers from this evaluation. |
DePIN Tokenomics Best Practices
messari.io/report/depin-tokenomics |
20%+ circulating at TGE, 1-year cliff for team, 4-year team vesting, emissions tied to actual work performed. |
All guidelines followed. v3.1: 10.7% at TGE (intentionally low for micro-price launch), team 1-year cliff + 4-year vest, node rewards proportional to uptime/shards/heartbeats. |
Tokenomics v3.1 published March 29, 2026. 1B supply model with corrected node naming, Zone A accessibility design, and structured airdrop schedule.
Revises: Tokenomics v3 — Three Plans •
Companion: Security Tiers v3 •
Data source: Global Equivalent Costs